# Informe P4 (2016)

Pràctica InglésUniversidad | Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña (UPC) |

Grado | Ingeniería de Sistemas de Telecomunicación - 2º curso |

Asignatura | Processat Digital del Senyal (PDS) |

Año del apunte | 2016 |

Páginas | 5 |

Fecha de subida | 11/10/2017 |

Descargas | 0 |

Subido por | mvallesmunoz |

### Vista previa del texto

1
Interfering Tone Suppression
Sergi Garreta Serra and Maria Vallès, students of EETAC (UPC)
xL=xstereo(:,2);
I. INTRODUCTION
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this practice is to design a digital system
capable of improving the quality of a signal contaminated by a
disturbing beep. In particular, the music is played by a record
player. To remove the interference of the analogue signal, this
signal has to be first digitalized and after digitally processed.

The steps we are going to follow are the following:
- Spectral analysis of the digitalized signal containing the
disturbance
- Design of the necessary filtering algorithm to remove
the unwanted tone or beep
We plot the waveform signal of one of the mono channel, in
this case the xR:
II. BACKGROUND STUDY
To reject only one specific frequency we need a band-stop
filter. We have two different ways to implement it: FIR and
IIR. Here we have the zero-pole diagram of them:
Fig. 2: xR plot
Now, to know which is the digital frequency (Ω) of the
interference tone, we plot the fft of xR with the following
instructions:
ft=abs(fft(xR, 2^nextpow2(2000000));
plot(ft)
Fig. 1: FIR and IIR zero-pole diagram
The transfer functions are the following:
FIR: H(z)=k ·((z-ejΩo)·(z- e-jΩo))/(z2)
IIR: H(z)= k ·((z-ejΩo)·(z- e-jΩo))/((z-r·ejΩo)·(z-r·e-jΩo))
III. PRACTICAL REALIZATION
First of all, we listen to the jaguai.wav file. We notice that the
song has been contaminated by a disturbing beep.

We open Matlab and load the file in a variable named xstereo
and split it into two mono signals (one for the right channel
and one for the left one) with the function:
xR=xstereo(:,1);
Fig. 3: FFT of xR
2
Once we have the plot, we execute this command to get the
amplitude and the index of the peak:
[y,i] = max (ft);
The values we obtain are y = 1,9858·10 5 and i = 45178, so the
digital frequency of the peak is 45177, because the vector
starts at 1. We also calculate omega [rad/sample] with the
formula (i*2*pi) / N, and the value calculated is 0,1354.

The analog frequency of the interference tone is calculated
with the formula f = (i·fs) / N [Hz] and we get the value
950,0264 Hz.

As we have said in the background study, the digital filter we
are going to use to suppress the interference tone is a bandstop filter.

We are going to analyze both FIR and IIR implementations
and discover which is better to delete the interference.

Fig. 5: FIR zero-pole diagram
Here the most relevant aspect is that the zeros are really near
to the 0 and, as we can see in the Figure 4, the module is zero
in values near to 0 and 2π.

Finite Impulse Response (FIR)
To plot its zero-pole diagram and module we use the
instruction fvtool and the roots of the polynomial with the
Now, we are going to find the impulse response (h(n)) of this
filter with the following instruction and save it into a new
variable, and after we plot the result using stem command:
command poly.

fvtool(poly(([exp(j*omega) exp (j*omega))], [1 0 0])
hnfir = dimpulse (poly(([exp(j*omega) exp
(-j*omega))], [1 0 0]);
stem(hnfir(1:10))
Fig. 4: FIR module plot
Fig. 6: Stem plot of H(n) FIR
The most important aspect of this graphic is that it has two
different amplitudes, so although the interference is deleted,
the original signal is distorted.

Finally, to end the study of the FIR implementation of the
filter, we calculate the output doing the convolution of the
signal and the filter:
ynfir=conv(xR,hnfir);
3
The plot of the response obtained is the following:
Fig. 8: IIR module plot
The most important thing about the last figure is that we only
have one amplitude, and we have to remember that this
response is infinite but MATLAB limit it.

Fig. 7: Plot of Y(n) FIR
The last step to end is to listen the response and check if the
interference has disappeared. We do this using a function
developed in one of the last practices: digital_to_analog:
function [] = digital_to_analog( signal,
fs )
player=audioplayer(signal, fs);
playblocking(player);
end
Con formato: Fuente: 10 pto, Inglés (Estados Unidos)
We substitute signal by ynfir and fs by the value of the original
signal frequency and listen it; the interference has disappeared.

Infinite Impulse Response (IIR)
Fig. 9: IIR zero-pole diagram
As we have done with the FIR, we use the fvtool instruction to
plot the pole-zero diagram and the module:
To find the impulse response (h(n)), we follow the same steps
as in the last system:
fvtool(poly([exp(j*omega) exp (-j*omega)],
poly ([r*exp(j*omega) r*exp(-j*omega)])
hniir = dimpulse(poly([exp(j*omega) exp (j*omega)], poly ([r*exp(j*omega) r*exp(j*omega)]);
stem(hniir(1:70))
4
Fig. 10: Stem plot of H(n) IIR
Fig. 12: Plot of Y(n) IIR
Finally, we calculate the output doing the convolution:
yniir = conv(xR, hniir);
We plot the result:
IV. CONCLUSIONS
This laboratory session has been really interesting.

The first thing that has to be highlighted is the fact that there is
a lot of differences between the response reached with the FIR
and the IIR implementations.

In both, the interference disappears, but in the first one the
sound is distorted. That happens because the filter has different
amplitudes and, when the original signal passes through it, it is
altered. With the second one, in addition to achieving the
objective of eliminate the interference, it also allows us to get
the signal as similar as possible to the original one.

Fig. 11: CANVIARRRRR Plot of Y(n) IIR
When we use the digital_to_analog function and listen to it
(substituting the attributes correctly), we notice that the
interference has disappeared, but not at all; we can already
listen to it.

Then, to correct our error, we try to adjust the value of the r
parameter and make it a little bit lower: 0,9 instead of 0,97.

We redo all the calculus and listen the new response and,
effectively, the interference has totally disappeared.

On the other hand, there is another aspect that is important to
explain. Why the first IIR system did not remove at all the
interference? This type of filter is really selective, and more if
the r value is very close to 1. In our first try, we determined the
r value as 0,97, and the error was that the peak was not
situated exactly in the correct “place”???, so it could not be
deleted at all. When we made the r value smaller (0,9), we
“open” the filter and make it less strict, so if the peak is not in
the exact point we need, it is also deleted.

Recapitulating, the best filter to delete interferences is the IIR
one, but only if the r value is adequately chosen.

5
V. REFERENC
ES
[1] EETAC-UPC Website: http://atenea.upc.edu/moodle.

...